Compare AI Models Side-by-Side
Compare API pricing, context windows, and capabilities across 300+ LLMs. Select 2–4 models to see how they stack up.
Select Models to Compare (2–4)
Select models above to start comparing
Choose 2–4 models to see side-by-side pricing and capabilities
Why Compare AI Models?
Save on API Costs
API pricing varies dramatically between providers. GPT-4o costs $5/$15 per million tokens, while DeepSeek V3 delivers strong performance at $0.27/$1.10 per million — a meaningful gap. Our comparison tool shows real costs for your specific token usage.
Find the Right Capabilities
Not all models support vision, function calling, or JSON mode. Compare capabilities side-by-side to find the model that fits your use case — whether that's multimodal AI, code generation, or long-context document processing.
Context Window Matters
Context windows range from 4K to 10M tokens. If you're processing long documents, codebases, or conversation history, you need a model with sufficient context. Meta's Llama 4 Scout offers 10M tokens — 100x more than standard 128K models.
Current Model Landscape
The AI model space keeps moving fast. OpenAI's GPT-4o and o3 series remain strong choices for reasoning and multimodal tasks. Anthropic's Claude Opus 4 and Sonnet 4 stand out for long-context coding and agentic workflows. Google's Gemini 2.5 Pro and Flash models offer competitive vision and throughput. DeepSeek, Qwen, and Llama 4 continue to push open-weight performance while keeping costs low. Compare them all here.